Session expired

Due to inactivity your session has expired. Please login again.

State accedendo al sito dal Paese Cina.
Per il vostro Paese (Cina) è disponibile anche una versione dedicata del sito.

Passare a Cina

Nuove funzionalità e miglioramenti:

la versione software 3.1.1 per i modelli HAMILTON-C1/T1/MR1

Foto dei ventilatori HAMILTON-C1, HAMILTON-T1 e HAMILTON-MR1 uno accanto all'altro Foto dei ventilatori HAMILTON-C1, HAMILTON-T1 e HAMILTON-MR1 uno accanto all'altro

Un aggiornamento, tre vantaggi: una marcia in più con la versione 3.1.1

L'aggiornamento alla versione software 3.1.1 aggiunge tre nuove e attese funzioni (Non disponibili in tutti i mercatiA​) ai ventilatori HAMILTON-C1/T1/MR1.

Per informazioni dettagliate sull'aggiornamento consultare la relativa brochure, le note di rilascio della versione software 3.1.1 e il Manuale operatore del dispositivo.
 

Le nuove opzioni software

NIV_Adult

Opzione NIV-only: la soluzione completa per la ventilazione non invasiva

A volte, meno è meglio. I ventilatori HAMILTON-C1/T1 con l'opzione NIV-only propongono solo le modalità davvero necessarie per un supporto ventilatorio non invasivo ad alte prestazioni.

 

Questa funzione opzionale consente di passare in modo fluido dalle modalità non invasive alla terapia con ossigeno ad alto flusso (Nota anche come "terapia ad alto flusso con cannula nasale". Questo termine e il termine "terapia con ossigeno ad alto flusso" sono equivalenti.B ) e viceversa in pazienti pediatrici e adulti, senza dover cambiare dispositivo né circuito paziente.

O2 assist

O2 assist: un assistente di precisione

O2 assist interviene con precisione come farebbe un assistente al posto letto. Contribuisce a mantenere i livelli di SpO2 entro gli intervalli target impostati per il singolo paziente, regolando in modo continuo l'erogazione dell'ossigeno.

 

In questo modo è possibile garantire al paziente una gestione continua e reattiva dell'ossigeno e permettere all'operatore di non sprecare tempo a girare manopole (Roca O, Caritg O, Santafé M, et al. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022;26(1):108. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w1​, Atakul G, Ceylan G, Sandal O, et al. Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1426969. Published 2024 Sep 10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.14269692​).

Intellisync

IntelliSync®+: per non perdere di vista la sincronia paziente-ventilatore

L'occhio addestrato di un esperto di ventilazione è in grado di rilevare le asincronie esaminando la forma delle curve di flusso e pressione. IntelliSync+ è uno strumento prezioso che permette di semplificare il flusso di lavoro gestendo automaticamente l'attivazione di trigger e ciclaggio.

 

Si tratta di una funzione che può aiutare gli operatori sanitari a risparmiare parte del tempo che verrebbe sprecato per regolare le impostazioni e dedicarlo invece ad altre più importanti attività da eseguire al posto letto.

Standard Opzionale Non disponibile
HAMILTON-C1 HAMILTON-T1 HAMILTON-MR1

O2 assist

Opzione NIV-only

IntelliSync+

Disponibilità

Controllate con i vostri occhi: prenotate una demo gratuita personalizzata o una telefonata

Prenotate una demo gratuita personalizzata o una telefonata con uno dei nostri specialisti, oppure richiedete semplicemente maggiori informazioni. Riempite il formulario qui sotto e vi contatteremo non appena possibile con tutti i dettagli.

Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study).

Roca O, Caritg O, Santafé M, et al. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022;26(1):108. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w

BACKGROUND We aimed to assess the efficacy of a closed-loop oxygen control in critically ill patients with moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) treated with high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO). METHODS In this single-centre, single-blinded, randomized crossover study, adult patients with moderate to severe AHRF who were treated with HFNO (flow rate ≥ 40 L/min with FiO2 ≥ 0.30) were randomly assigned to start with a 4-h period of closed-loop oxygen control or 4-h period of manual oxygen titration, after which each patient was switched to the alternate therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the individualized optimal SpO2 range. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included. Patients spent more time in the optimal SpO2 range with closed-loop oxygen control compared with manual titrations of oxygen (96.5 [93.5 to 98.9] % vs. 89 [77.4 to 95.9] %; p < 0.0001) (difference estimate, 10.4 (95% confidence interval 5.2 to 17.2). Patients spent less time in the suboptimal range during closed-loop oxygen control, both above and below the cut-offs of the optimal SpO2 range, and less time above the suboptimal range. Fewer number of manual adjustments per hour were needed with closed-loop oxygen control. The number of events of SpO2 < 88% and < 85% were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen administration in patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF treated with HFNO, increasing the percentage of time in the optimal oxygenation range and decreasing the workload of healthcare personnel. These results are especially relevant in a context of limited oxygen supply and high medical demand, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration The HILOOP study was registered at www. CLINICALTRIALS gov under the identifier NCT04965844 .

Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study.

Atakul G, Ceylan G, Sandal O, et al. Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1426969. Published 2024 Sep 10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1426969

BACKGROUND The aim of this study is the evaluation of a closed-loop oxygen control system in pediatric patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). METHODS Cross-over, multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. Patients between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were undergoing IMV therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) were assigned at random to either begin with a 2-hour period of closed-loop oxygen control or manual oxygen titrations. By using closed-loop oxygen control, the patients' SpO2 levels were maintained within a predetermined target range by the automated adjustment of the FiO2. During the manual oxygen titration phase of the trial, healthcare professionals at the bedside made manual changes to the FiO2, while maintaining the same target range for SpO2. Following either period, the patient transitioned to the alternative therapy. The outcomes were the percentage of time spent in predefined SpO2 ranges ±2% (primary), FiO2, total oxygen use, and the number of manual adjustments. FINDINGS The median age of included 33 patients was 17 (13-55.5) months. In contrast to manual oxygen titrations, patients spent a greater proportion of time within a predefined optimal SpO2 range when the closed-loop oxygen controller was enabled (95.7% [IQR 92.1-100%] vs. 65.6% [IQR 41.6-82.5%]), mean difference 33.4% [95%-CI 24.5-42%]; P < 0.001). Median FiO2 was lower (32.1% [IQR 23.9-54.1%] vs. 40.6% [IQR 31.1-62.8%]; P < 0.001) similar to total oxygen use (19.8 L/h [IQR 4.6-64.8] vs. 39.4 L/h [IQR 16.8-79]; P < 0.001); however, median SpO2/FiO2 was higher (329.4 [IQR 180-411.1] vs. 246.7 [IQR 151.1-320.5]; P < 0.001) with closed-loop oxygen control. With closed-loop oxygen control, the median number of manual adjustments reduced (0.0 [IQR 0.0-0.0] vs. 1 [IQR 0.0-2.2]; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION Closed-loop oxygen control enhances oxygen therapy in pediatric patients undergoing IMV for AHRF, potentially leading to more efficient utilization of oxygen. This technology also decreases the necessity for manual adjustments, which could reduce the workloads of healthcare providers. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION This research has been submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05714527).