Session expired

Due to inactivity your session has expired. Please login again.

我们检测到您正在 中国 访问我们的网站。
我们针对您的国家(中国)提供单独版本的网站。

切换至 中国

New features and improvements.

Software version 3.1.1 for HAMILTON-C1/T1/MR1

Photo of the HAMILTON-C1, HAMILTON-T1 and HAMILTON-MR1 side-by-side Photo of the HAMILTON-C1, HAMILTON-T1 and HAMILTON-MR1 side-by-side

One move, triple the value. The power of software 3.1.1

The software update 3.1.1 brings three exciting new features (Not available in all marketsA​) to the HAMILTON-C1/T1/MR1 ventilators.

For detailed information about the update refer to the respective brochure, software release notes v3.1.1 and operator's manual for your device.
 

The new software options

NIV_Adult

NIV-only option. The complete solution for noninvasive ventilation

Less can also be more! The HAMILTON-C1/T1 with the NIV-only option offers just the modes you need for high-performance noninvasive ventilation support.

 

It enables you to transition seamlessly between noninvasive modes and high flow oxygen therapy (Also known as high flow nasal cannula therapy. This terminology can be used interchangeably with high flow oxygen therapy.B​) (optional) for pediatrics and adults, without changing the device or even the breathing circuit.

O2 assist

O2 assist. Your precision care assistant

O2 assist acts as your precision-care assistant at the bedside. It helps maintain your patient's SpO2 levels within individually set target ranges by continuously adjusting oxygen delivery.

 

This ensures continuous and responsive oxygen management for your patient and less knob-turning for you (Roca O, Caritg O, Santafé M, et al. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022;26(1):108. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w1​, Atakul G, Ceylan G, Sandal O, et al. Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1426969. Published 2024 Sep 10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.14269692​).

Intellisync

IntelliSync®+. Keeping an eye on patient‑ventilator synchrony

The well-trained eye of a ventilation expert is capable of detecting asynchronies by analyzing the shapes of the flow and pressure waveforms. IntelliSync+ offers valuable workflow support by managing triggering and cycling automatically.

 

This feature can help healthcare professionals spend less time adjusting these settings and free them up to focus more on other important bedside tasks.

Standard Optional Not available
HAMILTON-C1 HAMILTON-T1 HAMILTON-MR1

O2 assist

NIV-only option

IntelliSync+

可用性

亲眼看看。 预订免费的个人演示或安排回电话

预订免费的个人演示或致电我们的专家,或直接索取更多信息。请填写下表,我们将为您提供所需的所有详细信息

Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study).

Roca O, Caritg O, Santafé M, et al. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022;26(1):108. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w



BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the efficacy of a closed-loop oxygen control in critically ill patients with moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) treated with high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO).

METHODS

In this single-centre, single-blinded, randomized crossover study, adult patients with moderate to severe AHRF who were treated with HFNO (flow rate ≥ 40 L/min with FiO2 ≥ 0.30) were randomly assigned to start with a 4-h period of closed-loop oxygen control or 4-h period of manual oxygen titration, after which each patient was switched to the alternate therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the individualized optimal SpO2 range.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included. Patients spent more time in the optimal SpO2 range with closed-loop oxygen control compared with manual titrations of oxygen (96.5 [93.5 to 98.9] % vs. 89 [77.4 to 95.9] %; p < 0.0001) (difference estimate, 10.4 (95% confidence interval 5.2 to 17.2). Patients spent less time in the suboptimal range during closed-loop oxygen control, both above and below the cut-offs of the optimal SpO2 range, and less time above the suboptimal range. Fewer number of manual adjustments per hour were needed with closed-loop oxygen control. The number of events of SpO2 < 88% and < 85% were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen administration in patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF treated with HFNO, increasing the percentage of time in the optimal oxygenation range and decreasing the workload of healthcare personnel. These results are especially relevant in a context of limited oxygen supply and high medical demand, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration The HILOOP study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov under the identifier NCT04965844 .

Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study.

Atakul G, Ceylan G, Sandal O, et al. Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1426969. Published 2024 Sep 10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1426969



BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is the evaluation of a closed-loop oxygen control system in pediatric patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

METHODS

Cross-over, multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. Patients between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were undergoing IMV therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) were assigned at random to either begin with a 2-hour period of closed-loop oxygen control or manual oxygen titrations. By using closed-loop oxygen control, the patients' SpO2 levels were maintained within a predetermined target range by the automated adjustment of the FiO2. During the manual oxygen titration phase of the trial, healthcare professionals at the bedside made manual changes to the FiO2, while maintaining the same target range for SpO2. Following either period, the patient transitioned to the alternative therapy. The outcomes were the percentage of time spent in predefined SpO2 ranges ±2% (primary), FiO2, total oxygen use, and the number of manual adjustments.

FINDINGS

The median age of included 33 patients was 17 (13-55.5) months. In contrast to manual oxygen titrations, patients spent a greater proportion of time within a predefined optimal SpO2 range when the closed-loop oxygen controller was enabled (95.7% [IQR 92.1-100%] vs. 65.6% [IQR 41.6-82.5%]), mean difference 33.4% [95%-CI 24.5-42%]; P < 0.001). Median FiO2 was lower (32.1% [IQR 23.9-54.1%] vs. 40.6% [IQR 31.1-62.8%]; P < 0.001) similar to total oxygen use (19.8 L/h [IQR 4.6-64.8] vs. 39.4 L/h [IQR 16.8-79]; P < 0.001); however, median SpO2/FiO2 was higher (329.4 [IQR 180-411.1] vs. 246.7 [IQR 151.1-320.5]; P < 0.001) with closed-loop oxygen control. With closed-loop oxygen control, the median number of manual adjustments reduced (0.0 [IQR 0.0-0.0] vs. 1 [IQR 0.0-2.2]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Closed-loop oxygen control enhances oxygen therapy in pediatric patients undergoing IMV for AHRF, potentially leading to more efficient utilization of oxygen. This technology also decreases the necessity for manual adjustments, which could reduce the workloads of healthcare providers.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This research has been submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05714527).