Session expired

Due to inactivity your session has expired. Please login again.

Wir haben festgestellt, dass Sie unsere Website von China aus besuchen.
Für Ihr Land (China) gibt es eine eigene Version der Website.

Zu China wechseln

Neue Funktionen und Verbesserungen.

Softwareversion 3.1.1 für den HAMILTON-C1/T1/MR1

Foto der Beatmungsgeräte HAMILTON-C1, HAMILTON-T1 und HAMILTON-MR1 nebeneinander Foto der Beatmungsgeräte HAMILTON-C1, HAMILTON-T1 und HAMILTON-MR1 nebeneinander

Eine Aktualisierung, drei Verbesserungen. Die Software 3.1.1 hat's in sich

Die Softwareaktualisierung 3.1.1 bringt drei aufregende neue Funktionen (Nicht für alle Märkte verfügbar.A​) für die Beatmungsgeräte HAMILTON-C1/T1/MR1.

Detaillierte Informationen zum Update finden Sie in den Hinweisen zur Softwareversion 3.1.1 sowie der jeweiligen Broschüre und dem Bedienungshandbuch zu Ihrem Beatmungsgerät.
 

Die neuen Softwareoptionen

NIV_Adult

Option NIV-only. Die Komplettlösung für die nichtinvasive Beatmung

Weniger kann auch mehr sein. Der HAMILTON-C1/T1 mit der Option NIV-only bietet genau die Modi, die Sie für eine leistungsfähige nichtinvasive Beatmungsunterstützung benötigen.

 

Die Option ermöglicht den nahtlosen Wechsel zwischen nichtinvasiven Modi und der High-Flow Sauerstofftherapie (Auch als Therapie mit High-Flow Nasenkanüle bezeichnet. Dieser Ausdruck kann alternativ zum Begriff „High-Flow Sauerstofftherapie“ verwendet werden.B​) (Option) für pädiatrische und erwachsene Patienten, ohne dass Änderungen am Gerät oder nicht mal am Beatmungsschlauchsystem erforderlich sind.

O2 assist

O2 assist. Ihr Präzisionspflege-Assistent

O2 assist fungiert als Ihr Präzisionspflege-Assistent am Patientenbett. Es unterstützt Sie dabei, die SpO2-Werte des Patienten innerhalb der individuell eingestellten Zielbereiche zu halten, indem es die Sauerstoffzufuhr fortlaufend anpasst.

 

Dies bedeutet ein kontinuierliches und reaktionsschnelles Sauerstoffmanagement für Ihren Patienten und weniger manuelle Anpassungen für Sie (Roca O, Caritg O, Santafé M, et al. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022;26(1):108. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w1​, Atakul G, Ceylan G, Sandal O, et al. Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1426969. Published 2024 Sep 10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.14269692​).

Intellisync

IntelliSync®+. Ein Auge auf der Synchronisation zwischen Patient und Beatmungsgerät

Das geschulte Auge eines Beatmungsexperten ist in der Lage, Asynchronitäten zu erkennen, indem es die Formen der Flow- oder Druckkurven analysiert. IntelliSync+ unterstützt effizient Ihre Arbeitsabläufe durch das automatische Management von Triggerung und Einleitung der Exspiration.

 

Diese Funktion kann dazu beitragen, dass das medizinische Fachpersonal weniger Zeit für die Anpassung der Einstellungen aufwenden muss und sich mehr auf andere wichtige Aufgaben am Patientenbett konzentrieren kann.

Standard Optional Nicht verfügbar
HAMILTON-C1 HAMILTON-T1 HAMILTON-MR1

O2 assist

Option NIV-only

IntelliSync+

Verfügbarkeit

Mit eigenen Augen ansehen. Kostenlose persönliche Live-Demonstration oder Rückruf

Buchen Sie eine kostenlose persönliche Live-Demonstration, telefonieren Sie mit einem unserer Spezialisten oder fordern Sie einfach weitere Informationen an. Füllen Sie das unten stehende Formular aus, und Sie erhalten von uns alle erforderlichen Details.

Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study).

Roca O, Caritg O, Santafé M, et al. Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure patients under high flow nasal oxygen: a randomized cross-over study (the HILOOP study). Crit Care. 2022;26(1):108. Published 2022 Apr 14. doi:10.1186/s13054-022-03970-w



BACKGROUND

We aimed to assess the efficacy of a closed-loop oxygen control in critically ill patients with moderate to severe acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) treated with high flow nasal oxygen (HFNO).

METHODS

In this single-centre, single-blinded, randomized crossover study, adult patients with moderate to severe AHRF who were treated with HFNO (flow rate ≥ 40 L/min with FiO2 ≥ 0.30) were randomly assigned to start with a 4-h period of closed-loop oxygen control or 4-h period of manual oxygen titration, after which each patient was switched to the alternate therapy. The primary outcome was the percentage of time spent in the individualized optimal SpO2 range.

RESULTS

Forty-five patients were included. Patients spent more time in the optimal SpO2 range with closed-loop oxygen control compared with manual titrations of oxygen (96.5 [93.5 to 98.9] % vs. 89 [77.4 to 95.9] %; p < 0.0001) (difference estimate, 10.4 (95% confidence interval 5.2 to 17.2). Patients spent less time in the suboptimal range during closed-loop oxygen control, both above and below the cut-offs of the optimal SpO2 range, and less time above the suboptimal range. Fewer number of manual adjustments per hour were needed with closed-loop oxygen control. The number of events of SpO2 < 88% and < 85% were not significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Closed-loop oxygen control improves oxygen administration in patients with moderate-to-severe AHRF treated with HFNO, increasing the percentage of time in the optimal oxygenation range and decreasing the workload of healthcare personnel. These results are especially relevant in a context of limited oxygen supply and high medical demand, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Trial registration The HILOOP study was registered at www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov under the identifier NCT04965844 .

Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study.

Atakul G, Ceylan G, Sandal O, et al. Closed-loop oxygen usage during invasive mechanical ventilation of pediatric patients (CLOUDIMPP): a randomized controlled cross-over study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1426969. Published 2024 Sep 10. doi:10.3389/fmed.2024.1426969



BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is the evaluation of a closed-loop oxygen control system in pediatric patients undergoing invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV).

METHODS

Cross-over, multicenter, randomized, single-blind clinical trial. Patients between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were undergoing IMV therapy for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF) were assigned at random to either begin with a 2-hour period of closed-loop oxygen control or manual oxygen titrations. By using closed-loop oxygen control, the patients' SpO2 levels were maintained within a predetermined target range by the automated adjustment of the FiO2. During the manual oxygen titration phase of the trial, healthcare professionals at the bedside made manual changes to the FiO2, while maintaining the same target range for SpO2. Following either period, the patient transitioned to the alternative therapy. The outcomes were the percentage of time spent in predefined SpO2 ranges ±2% (primary), FiO2, total oxygen use, and the number of manual adjustments.

FINDINGS

The median age of included 33 patients was 17 (13-55.5) months. In contrast to manual oxygen titrations, patients spent a greater proportion of time within a predefined optimal SpO2 range when the closed-loop oxygen controller was enabled (95.7% [IQR 92.1-100%] vs. 65.6% [IQR 41.6-82.5%]), mean difference 33.4% [95%-CI 24.5-42%]; P < 0.001). Median FiO2 was lower (32.1% [IQR 23.9-54.1%] vs. 40.6% [IQR 31.1-62.8%]; P < 0.001) similar to total oxygen use (19.8 L/h [IQR 4.6-64.8] vs. 39.4 L/h [IQR 16.8-79]; P < 0.001); however, median SpO2/FiO2 was higher (329.4 [IQR 180-411.1] vs. 246.7 [IQR 151.1-320.5]; P < 0.001) with closed-loop oxygen control. With closed-loop oxygen control, the median number of manual adjustments reduced (0.0 [IQR 0.0-0.0] vs. 1 [IQR 0.0-2.2]; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Closed-loop oxygen control enhances oxygen therapy in pediatric patients undergoing IMV for AHRF, potentially leading to more efficient utilization of oxygen. This technology also decreases the necessity for manual adjustments, which could reduce the workloads of healthcare providers.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

This research has been submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05714527).